Perhaps it is unduly difficult to propose that the public fascination could annul the defence of consent in specific scenarios and then in the condition of 'good reason' recreate it. Individuals who embrace ethical non-monogamy prioritize communication, honesty, and consent in their intimate pursuits. When a servant who has been all working day labouring difficult to give an component of consolation and cleanliness to the particular office committed to her care, sees the youthful girls of the spouse and children arrive home from their every day walk, and, by no means dreaming of her, or her tricky labour, trample around the hall and stairs with out stopping to rid on their own of that incumbrance of clay, which a fanciful author has classed among the "miseries of human life" is it to be anticipated that the servant who sees this, should really be so much uninfluenced by the passions of humanity, as not to sense the stirrings of rage and resentment in her bosom? The Department has regarded thoroughly the worries of many commenters who believe this provision will lead to witness tampering or intimidation, or if not interfere with a proper investigation.