That we should avoid making assumptions about either who audiences are or how audiences respond to smut has been a core interest to pro this quarterly and the researchers that are associated with it. Indeed, another extraordinary consummation devoted to audiences and consumers of porn edited close to Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this site as a starting point. In the bring in unconventional uncertain, Person Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too Honourable Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences benefit of gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a flier memorize into the responses of a representational of largely Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the study, women not only have a positive answer to gay porn and the gay bonking represented but also report feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent belles-lettres on the divergent audiences someone is concerned gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) excellent try also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating inquiry of male porn viewers and the significant audience probing project conducted through Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all control collectively to fly apart stereotypes and generalizations take porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.