That we should shun making assumptions about either who audiences are or how audiences answer to filth has been a gist interest to representing this daily and the researchers that are associated with it. Indeed, another extraordinary debouchment doting to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this situation as a starting point. In the propinquitous specific uncertain, Cat Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too Compelling Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a pilot study into the responses of a representational of largely Dutch participants to a selected swatch of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the study, women not simply obtain a upbeat rejoinder to gay porn and the gay copulation represented but also narrate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent literature on the varying audiences someone is concerned gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) bar endeavour also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating breakdown of masculine porn viewers and the major audience research venture conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), Gay0Day and which all work collectively to blast stereotypes and generalizations thither porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.