You can be an advocate for your child. The Institute of Child Health Trust and anothers. The Child of defacto unfortunately expired on 4th May 2009 at CMRI due to alleged forcible operations on the minor child of the complainant. The accused no. (2) to (8) treated him recklessely and negligently and also performed operastion on him forcefully without the concern of the guardian due to which the condition of the patient detrirated he became serious. The police did not register any FIR against the accused persons, rather police taken the endeavour to make the complainant understand that the accused persons may further commit similar nature of offence on the complainant as to take revenge. Which was issued by the Constable Swarup Duibey of Alipore Police Station, wherein he asked the petitioner to collect the copy of FIR on 11.01.2010, during office hour, and contact S.I. It is therefore prayed that your Honour would graciously be pleased to allow this application Under Section 156(3) of Criminal Procedure Code’ 1973 and direct the Officer-In-Charge of Anandapur Police Station to treat this application as an FIR and to cause necessary investigation in terms of the Criminal Procedure Code’ 1973. And or to pass such other necessary order or orders as your Honour may deem fit and proper for end of justice.


11. That Since, the substantial period has been elapsed, even after communication made to the higher police officer, the police authority did not lodge the facts of the complainant and did not cause necessary investigation against the accused person. Therefore so many criminal cases had lodge by the vicinity people against the accused persons, which are probably pending before the Learned Court. 3. That the accused persons are residing in the same vicinity and are usually visited the fast food shop of the complainant's husband for purchasing different snacks and other food products, time and again. However, on hearing such hue and cry of the complainant, the elder son of the complainant and some of the persons of the vicinity reached the place and on their intervention, the accused persons fled away leaving their threat and dire consequence, to kill life of the complainant. Officer-in-Charge of Police, for the offences under Section 304A, 336,337,338,352,166,167,168, and 34 of the Indian Penal Code’ 1860, and whereas two more sheets has been provided to your petitioner as "A" and "B", wnereas "A" contain list of the accused person and "B" contain the following " on the basis of court petition under Section 156 (3) filed by Shri Jyoti Prokash Ch S/o.


Written Argument filed by the O.P. 4. Written version filed by the o.p. P. FOR THAT the said Kalpana Sarkar filed a Title suit being no. 75 of 2012 on 12.03.2012 before LD. Z. FOR THAT the Learned Trial Forum below did not consider the said civil suit being no. T.S. I, Smt. Swapna Mistry, being the petitioner, herein, do hereby declare that the forgoing paragraphs no. to are true to the best of my knowledge and rest prayers portions are my humble submission before the Learned Court and I duty sign and briefly this plaint on. T. FOR THAT in respect of the application by Smt. O. FOR THAT during the construction work, one Smt. Beyond being a lawyer, there are a variety of careers available in the legal field, many of which connect with one another. 4 : That on 10th day of January’ 2010, the defacto complainant / petitioner, received one message through the Police personnel of the Sonarpur Police Station. 3 : That the Defacto-Complainant / Petitioner, communicated about the order dated 31.12.2009, passed by this Learned Court in Complaint Case being number 8181 of 2009, to the Officer-in-Charge of the Alipore Police Station, through his Learned Advocate with a prayer to get a FREE copy of the FIR, vide letter being no. Legal / JPC / MEDI / 112 / 10 dated 8th day of January’ 2010, which has been duly received and acknowledged by the Police Officials of the Alipore Police Station.


IX. That the appellants enclosing herewith the Original Certified Copy of the Order & Judgment dated 30-09-2015, passed by the Learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, at Barasat, North 24 Parganas, in CC/249/2015. VII. That the appellant states and submits that the Order & Judgment dated 30-09-2015, passed by the Learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, at Barasat, North 24 Parganas, in CC/249/2015, suffered with gross errors and highly prejudice. Let a copy of this order be sent to joint Commissioner of Police, ( Crime ) Detective Department of Kolkata Police and present I.O. The Joint Commissioner of Police ( Crime ) Detective Department of Kolkata Police, is directed to take up further investigation of this case in the interest of justice and fair investigation. I.O. to continue the investigation of this case in order to inspire confidence in the applicant who is suffered death of his only child, the prayer (c) may be allowed in the interest of justice. Violation of Securities laws: In the stock marker when the broker executes the Dabba Trading in the clients account without executing the order on an exchange, it is the violation of Section 13 of Securities Contract Regulation Act, 1956 which states that transaction has to be at recognized Stock Exchange between the two recognized stock brokers of the exchange unless it is exempted.


Should you loved this short article and you would want to receive more information relating to legal what does it mean please visit the internet site.