That we should refrain from making assumptions almost either who audiences are or how audiences retort be responsive to to filth has been a insides shtick representing this journal and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another extraordinary consummation staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited close to Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the propinquitous odd big problem, Cat Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Stare: "He’s too Compelling Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman study into the responses of a sample of mainly Dutch participants to a selected try of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, gay0day women not only possess a complete return to gay porn and the gay copulation represented but also statement feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the divergent audiences someone is concerned gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating inquiry of masculine porn viewers and the significant audience research layout conducted not later than Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all work collectively to blast stereotypes and generalizations about porn audiences, who they are and how they present to porn materials.