The starting point for this route is naturally a revisiting of the last, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to specify his own reassessment of what has appropriate for a foundational essay for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the status of the field. As eternally, his humour and acuity is splendid (his feather of Gail Dines as this review’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me laugh every time I make read it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Erotica, Gay vs. Right: a Exclusive Revisit’ that his bash at was sooner than no means the first on the subject. ‘Men’s Filth: Gay vs Straight’ is nonetheless in my spectacle (and gay0day this is a picture shared by numberless others) an especially mighty intervention. In this late article, Waugh describes the lodge of sexual and cultural circumstances that experience to the advertisement of his effort in Rise Cut in 1985. In particular this reappraisal usefully works to jog the memory readers of the innovations contained therein. These classify a systematic rubric in behalf of interpretation and the especially apposite (and in uncountable regards fatidic) criticism that gay porn does not eke out a living in lavish isolation and should be more meaningfully arranged as chiefly of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.