Most people feel reassured by the pictures of happy veterinarians and dog breeders paying tribute to the commercial pet food they feed their dogs. Or perhaps, you've been assured by your personal vet of the fact that their food sell is sure to be nutritionally balanced.


For your dog's sake be skeptical. Don't believe in anybody (including myself) that what they are offering you is the best for your dog's interests.


In fact, it could be in their own interest if they gain a sale from convincing you.


If you're having difficulty getting your head around the concept of dog food that is raw food, then it's your problem, not your dog's.


The dog's diet evolved from eating raw food throughout millennia. Humans have only recently taken an interest in making dog food.


Can you imagine even for a moment that humans were capable of altering the dog's digestive and immune system over the course of fifty years?


You may well say that humans have had an influence on the appearance of dogs in all of the various breeds. Yes, that's true. Have you noticed that pedigree dog breeds are also the ones with the highest health risk? What I call an Heinz 57 dog, is normally much healthier.


So in breeding a selective type of dog, humans have gone against nature, by isolating one or more characteristics until the breed is what breeders want.


And so it is with food. Humans experiment food under the pretense of'science'. I call it junk science, because there is nothing scientific in pet food that is sold in the market. The term "science" has been embraced by the majority of people. Similar to the term "natural" is currently enjoying popularity.


A clever commercial dog food producer uses the words'science' and/or 'natural' in the marketing, in order to draw you into.


That doesn't mean there's anything that's of high quality in the pack or could it be something else. There's no way of knowing what the method of preparation was or what is in each packet.


Raw dog food, on the other hand, contains all the vital nutrients needed for an overall healthy dog.


I am aware that it might take some time for you to comprehend the idea, since you've probably been brought up on the idea that commercial pet food is the healthiest option.


If this is the case what is the likelihood is it that the health of dogs always improves after a change from commercial to raw pet food? The only way to be sure is going to discover the truth is to test it yourself.


You might be concerned about bacteria and parasites in dog food that is raw.


These aren't something that dogs have to worry about who have a digestive system that is extremely robust, and has strong digestive juices. Here is more on raw cat food recall review our site. Dogs aren't carnivores; they're omnivores, which means they are able to eat almost anything (as long as it's raw), including vegetation and decaying carcasses.


In fact, you will observe that when feeding raw dog food the number of worms and fleas diminishes and disappear.


Dogs have problems with non-natural food items - ones that are cookedor that contain preservatives. Both are not natural. Cooking degrades vitamins and also denatures the other nutrients.


I can genuinely assure you, that your dogs health will significantly improve when you start feeding a fresh dog's food. There may be a 'de-toxing' period initially however this is normal and natural, and only takes a short time to go through.


Try it out for one month and test it out for yourself? What have you got to lose?