That we should refrain from making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences answer to erotica has been a gist interest to representing this daily and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another different consummation staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited aside Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this site as a starting point. In the present specific uncertain, Cat Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Stare: "He’s too Compelling Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences in compensation gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a pilot study into the responses of a representational of largely Dutch participants to a selected try of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the chew over, Gay0Day women not only possess a supportive return to gay porn and the gay fucking represented but also statement feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent leaflets on the divergent audiences in behalf of gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) excellent try also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating analysis of manful porn viewers and the crucial audience research project conducted through Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all work collectively to fly apart stereotypes and generalizations forth porn audiences, who they are and how they tell to porn materials.