Why do we take excuse in blaming Globalization concept for all our problems? Why do we consider it a form of economic slavery or an imperialist design of the developed world? It is because, we have never tried to understand it in right perspective.
Globalization’s biggest disadvantage till date is the increased activities of extremism which people "express" over the internet. Free trade will allow people to buy anything from anywhere in the world if hurdles of tariffs, sales taxes and, other subsidies are removed. One cannot deny that free trade is the most significant advantage of globalization. That is because the lower prices allow more purchase of the product that stimulates growth eventually. They were scared of the hot money, but they could not disagree with the I.M.F., lest they be seen as irresponsible. If the I.M.F. expressed disapproval, it would drive away other donors and private investors as well.
Although free trade increases opportunities for international trade, it also increases the risk of failure for smaller companies that cannot compete globally. Additionally, free trade may drive up production and labor costs, including higher wages for a more skilled workforce, which again can lead to outsourcing jobs from countries with higher wages. Globalization compels businesses to adapt to different strategies based on new ideological trends that try to balance the rights and interests of both the individual and the community as a whole. This change enables businesses to compete worldwide and also signifies a dramatic change for business leaders, labor, and management by legitimately accepting the participation of workers and the government in developing and implementing company policies and strategies. Risk reduction via diversification can be accomplished through company involvement with international financial institutions and partnering with both local and multinational businesses. The goal of globalization is to provide organizations a superior competitive position with lower operating costs, to gain greater numbers of products, services, and consumers.
There is no definite solution; therefore we can only experiment, try out different methods of solving; unemployment, exploitation of workers, and poverty.
Many conservationists argue that international integration encourages the overexploitation of fragile natural resources, such as forests and fisheries, damaging the livelihoods of the poor. A common charge against transnational companies is that they flock to poor countries with lax environmental standards. Anecdotes abound, but researchers have done very few statistical studies. One of the few, published in 2003 by Gunnar Eskeland of the World Bank and Ann Harrison of the University of California, Berkeley, considered Mexico, Morocco, Venezuela and Ivory Coast. It found very little evidence that companies chose to invest in these countries to shirk pollution-abatement costs in rich countries; the single most important factor in determining the amount of investment was the size of the local market. Within a given industry, foreign plants tended to pollute less than their local peers.

But more than half of the respondents also believed that immigrants may take their jobs, with people of lower socio-economic status more likely to express such worries. The Walt Disney Company is having a strong brand name and reputation in this world, it should keep it up and achieve its mission all the time which is to make everyone happy. I believe that Disney will never fail in its business and always stay at the top level. Bad weathers like rain and thunderstorm decreases entrance tickets sales of Disney theme parks as consumers will be taking the consideration under the hazardous weather. Take Gold Coast theme parks as example, the wet weather at south-eastern Queensland had affected the revenue of the company to fall.
On the other hand, critics of globalization will point to the negative impact it has had on specific nations’ industries, which might face increased competition from international firms. Globalization can also have negative environmental impacts due to economic development, industrialization, and international travel. PRANAB BARDHAN is an economics professor at the University of California, Berkeley. He has done theoretical research and field studies on rural institutions in poor countries, on the political economy of development policies, and on international trade. He is perhaps best known for showing that economic efficiency and social justice are not antithetical goals; indeed, they are often complementary. Bardhan was editor in chief of the Journal of Development Economics from 1985 to 2003 and is currently co-chair of a MacArthur Foundationfunded international research network on inequality and economic performance.
Globalization is good because it provides the world with more efficient markets, increases competition leading to better goods, generates wealth in all parts of the world and builds and stabilizes security. Globalization is steadily growing as technology allows individuals within each country to communicate with people previously out of reach. Arjun Appadurai talks about the possible effect of ‘homogenization’ of culture, where dominant nations like the United States spread their cultures through television and movies, which leads to the dilution and loss of local and indigenous cultures. The growth of stock exchanges like the NYSE and FTSE as well as internationalization of financial markets has made it easier for people to transfer money internationally. Technological globalization refers to the spread of technology around the world.


Dani Rodrik, an economist at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government and a leading academic critic of the rules of globalization, argues for a scheme of legal short-term migration.

Probably, each country should chart out its globalisation problems plan and programme.

Privatization without land reform or strong competitive policies resulted in crony capitalism, large businesses run by organized crime, and neo-feudalism without a middle class.

However, some feminist philosophers are quick to argue that neoliberalism has not resulted in increased political influence for women on the whole, especially at the level of global politics.

They contend that even apparently gender-neutral global issues often have a gendered dimension, including war, global governance, migration, southern debt, the "resource curse," and climate change.


The latter, shifted at the click of a mouse, can stampede around the globe in herdlike movements, causing massive damage to fragile economies. Following speculators' run on the Thai currency, the baht, the poverty rate in rural Thailand jumped 50 percent in just one year. In Indonesia, a mass withdrawal of short-term capital caused real wages in manufacturing to drop 44 percent. Many economists now see a need for some form of control over short-term capital flows, particularly if domestic financial institutions and banking standards are weak.

But today if I were to picket globalization, I would protest other inequities. In a way, the chicken worker, who came to the factory when driving a taxi ceased to be profitable, is a beneficiary of globalization. So are the millions of young women who have left rural villages to be exploited gluing tennis shoes or assembling computer keyboards. The losers are those who get laid off when companies move to low-wage countries, or those forced off their land when imports undercut their crop prices, or those who can no longer afford life-saving medicine -- people whose choices in life diminish because of global trade. Globalization has offered this man a hellish job, but it is a choice he did not have before, and he took it; I don't name him because he is afraid of being fired. When I first set out to see for myself whether globalization has been for better or for worse, I was perplexed, too.
Volkswagen Mexico also makes Jettas and, in a special hall, 80 classic Beetles a day to sell in Mexico, one of the last places in the world where the old Bug still chugs. In timely and incisive analysis, our experts parse the latest development news and devise practical solutions to new and emerging challenges. You may change your billing preferences at any time in the Customer Center or call Customer Service. You may cancel your subscription at anytime by calling Customer Service. The 8 types of globalization are not as distinct as you might first think. One type of globalization may have similar characteristics of another and they may influence one another.
This is because they usually have more valuable assets that can be used as security , and are seen to be a lower risk, especially in comparison with new businesses. In fact, many new businesses fail within their first few years because of cash-flow inadequacies. Administrative savings can arise when large firms spread their administrative and management costs across all their plants, departments, divisions, or subsidiaries.