- Дата: 23-09-2024, 09:54
Doubt concerning the precise prevalence of those seductions was quickly replaced by certainty that it was descriptions about childhood fantasy that have been being provided. It does not comply with that, if Freud’s concept is unscientific, and even false, it can't present us with a basis for the useful treatment of neurotic illness because the relationship between a theory’s truth or falsity and its utility-worth is removed from being an isomorphic one. Fancher, R. Psychoanalytic Psychology: The development of Freud’s Thought. Abramson, J.B. Liberation and Its Limits: The Moral and Political Thought of Freud. Bettlelheim, B. Freud and Man’s Soul. If this contention is true-and it must at the very least be contemplated seriously-then that is undoubtedly essentially the most severe criticism that Freud and his followers have to face. However the contention of a few of Freud’s critics right here is that his patients were not recalling childhood fantasies, but traumatic occasions from their childhood which were all too actual. The issue with Freud’s idea is that it gives us entities (for instance repressed unconscious conflicts), which are mentioned to be the unobservable causes of certain types of habits But there aren't any correspondence rules for these alleged causes-they can't be recognized except by reference to the behavior which they're said to cause (that's, the analyst does not demonstratively assert: "This is the unconscious cause, and that is its behavioral effect;" reasonably he asserts: "This is the conduct, therefore its unconscious trigger must exist"), and this does raise critical doubts as to whether or not Freud’s idea presents us real causal explanations at all.