> I am using LinkedIn to maintain with my professional connections and support them with introductions. Since you are one of the people I recommend, I wanted to invite you to get into my community on LinkedIn. >>Basic membership is free, and it takes less when compared to a minute to sign up and join my network. I've received above 35 announcements similar to this, worded almost exactly the same way. The senders have acted surprise... Like me, have you ever received email invitations like these? >I am using LinkedIn to keep up with my professional connections and help them with introductions. Because you are one of the people I recommend, I wanted to ask you to access my system on LinkedIn. >>Basic account is free, and it requires less when compared to a second to sign up and join my network. I've received well over 35 invitations like this, worded almost exactly the same manner. The senders have acted amazed and hurt that I did not start to reap the benefits of this request. Let's look at the problems in this request from a marketing perspective. * The majority of the invitations I received were from people whose names I did not recognize. Why would I wish to be part of their network? The request does not say how I would benefit from their system and who they're, who they've use of. * What's Linked-in, how does it work and what're the advantages of using it? No-one has yet explained this clearly in their request. You can't expect that some body receiving this request knows what you're asking them to join or how it'd be advantageous to them. It would be helpful to have a passage or two describing how it works and mentioning a certain effect the person behind the invitation liked from membership. It could be that people believe that since 'basic account is free,' the normal recipient with this invitation will proceed and join. But even if it does not charge money, time would be taken by joining. To research more, please consider having a gander at: success. You still require to 'sell' people o-n having a free activity, especially with respect to an activity or business that may be unfamiliar for them. * Nobody got time to head off possible misconceptions or objections to the account. As a non-member of Linked In, I'm anxious that joining would open me up to a large amount of mail and telephone calls that would spend my time and where I would have no interest. Again, you can't believe that something free is thus enticing; you must imagine why some body could have questions or dismiss the concept and address those questions. * Using a processed request that is almost the exact same as everyone else's doesn't produce a great impression. To read more, we recommend people take a glance at: jump button. Even though the writing supplied by Linked In were successful, which it is not, you had want to give your individual stamp to it. Aside from being irritated that they're apparently encouraging individuals to send invitations that make little sense, I've nothing against Linked In. Perhaps it is a helpful organization. My position is that its members have to use good sense and basic marketing principles to encourage active, suspicious individuals to give a chance to it..